Author: Robert Pear
Published: Sept. 29, 2008 with a print version in the Times on Sept. 30
The article covered the controversy between the House and Senate over a proposal to offer tax incentives for using renewable energy. With its large number of sources and quotes, it would seem that the article is relatively unbiased, presenting the partisan sides of the story equally. However, upon investigating the sources from which Pear pulled, this article takes on an undeniably liberal spin. His sources are as follows:
-Rhone Resch, President of the Solar Energy Industries Association
-Gregory S. Wetstone, director of government affairs at the American Wind Energy Association
-Jerry M. Howard, executive Vice President of the National Association of Home Builders
-Representative Mike Ross, democrat
-Senator Charles E. Grassley, senior Republican of the Finance Committee
-Steny H. Hoyer, House Democratic leader
-Max Baucus, Democratic chairman of the Finance Committee
Pear also mentioned the Sierra Club, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, and Harry Reid, the Democratic Senator Majority leader. The average reader would take no notice of Pear's sources since the seems to pull from both sides of the fence, however further reasearch demonstrates otherwise. Considering their ties to environmental issues, organizations such as the AWEA and SEIA obviously lean to the left and support the liberal side of the issue, however their partisan nature is muted and generally harmless. The Sierra Club, on the other hand, is so blatantly liberal that it tags John McCain as a "bad guy" on their website and promotes Barrack Obama as his "good guy" counterpart. Additionally, the article cites four Democratic politicians and only one Republican. Although the environment tends to be a Democratic subject, this article was not fair or balanced in its representation of the issue at hand. By favoring liberal points of view and mentioning almost solely liberal companies and associations, Pear created a clear bias.
Although I would like to mention that the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association clearly noted on its website that it will "support congressional candidates regardless of party." So, Pear got at least one bipartisan point of view.
Links:
American Wind Energy Association - http://www.awea.org/
Solar Energy Industries Association - http://www.seia.org/
National Association of Home Builders - http://www.nahb.org/
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association - http://www.nreca.org/
Sierra Club - http://www.sierraclub.org/
Article - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/washington/30energy.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
i liked how you didn't hold back on this, haha.
yea on face value this article seems to be non-partisan, but your research definitely proves otherwise. could this just be a mistake on the journalist's part, that he did this without knowing where these people lie exactly on the political spectrum? or is the media just blatantly liberal now?
Post a Comment