This article was a fairly simple outline of a relatively controversial issue in the United States - the use of retardant in fighting wildfires. It had the generic "these people like it, these people don't" set up and explained why with the typical back-up quotes to support the positions. There really was nothing special about it. Just a run-of-the-mill news story about an issue. Nothing that points to the New York Times brand stands out.
No comments:
Post a Comment